| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
Here are some alternative ways to have done what Mosmake does for you:
mosmldep that
creates a makefile fragment based on a simple analysis of the contents
`.sml' and `.sig' files. It has the advantage over Mosmake
that it tracks dependencies automatically. On the other hand, it only
works for structure-mode units (an obvious shortcoming), and it does not
support multiple directories either. I used it once, and it must have
had more problems than these, because I remember ending up with writing
a Perl postprocessor that converted its output into something
better. (This postprocessor can count as the earliest ancestor of
Mosmake). Don't ask me for details, though.
make at all. Type in mosmlc commands by
hand, or write a script that just recompiles everything from scratch
unconditionally.
| [ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |